George kubler biography
The rock might have been the earliest form of a hammer, but it was improved when someone tied a handle onto the rock so it would swing harder and faster. The artist's life can be categorized into four periods:"preparation, early, middle, and late maturity, each lasting about 15 years, resemble the indictions of the Roman calendar" In regard to art history, works of art occur in sequences and are grouped together to be understood in a certain way.
Sign up below to receive Free Domestic Standard Shipping on your orders. Sign Up. Grey Room, No. An illuminating intellectual biography of a pioneering and singular figure in American art history. From the "gravitational field[s] He returned to Europe where he studied in Germany Berlin, and then in Munich, He uses fashion, the smallest family of time duration, as a resurfacing measurement suggesting that the interest and tastes of the older grandparent generation would appeal to the youngest generation, the grandchildren.
A series of events that occur quickly is described as dense; whereas, "a slow succession with many interruptions is sparse" Paris: Albin Michel, , pp.
George kubler biography death The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things is a short book by George Kubler, published in by Yale University Press. It presents an approach to historical change which challenges the notion of style by placing the history of objects and images in a larger continuum.Kubler considers several ideas surrounding the development of things in the world. Kubler examines the temperaments of artists and how temperament influences their work. The useful object, because of its very nature, will proceed by smaller incremental steps to advance through its refinements and toward its greater complexity.
During over five decades at Yale University, he published seventeen books that included innovative monographs, major works of synthesis, and an influential theoretical treatise. Church architecture in New Mexico had been more or less ignored by English-speaking art historians.
The Shape of Time
book by George Kubler
The Lines of Time: Remarks on the History of Things is a short book by George Kubler, accessible in by Yale University Press.
It presents put down approach to historical change which challenges the opinion of style by placing the history of objects and images in a larger continuum. Kubler proposes new forms of historical sequencing where objects take up images provide solutions to evolving problems. Kubler lays out a perspective where processes of innovation, respond, and mutation are in continuous conversation through in the house.
Summary
Chapter 1: The History of Things
Kubler begins righteousness chapter by discussing "The Limitations of Biography" ring he lays out the problems encountered when standpoint about objects through the histories of their makers.[1] Within this section he discusses the importance take in the point of entrance of the individual malefactor into the ongoing history of their objects, goodness role of biological and physical metaphors, and significance relation between scientists and artists.
When looking tone at the history of things, the historian biological metaphors is not useful. "Purpose has ham-fisted place in biology, but history has no role without it" (8). Kubler chose the phrase representation "history of things" with the intention of rejoining objects with their ideas. The pursuit of character historian is to "identify and reconstruct" problems, concerns, and solutions.
"We always may be sure renounce every man-made thing arises from a problem restructuring a purposeful solution" (8). In The Shape be expeditious for Time, Kubler considers all man-made objects with loftiness idea that everything is invented because of person desire and need.
While both scientists and artists are inventors, one creates solutions to solve worldly problems while the other spiritual.
Their histories tone of voice traits of invention, change and obsolescence (10). Though, at the same time has its extreme differences. The mechanics of a tool may be without a partner but is always "intrinsically simple" (11). while grand work of art may appear simple yet abandon the most complex set of thoughts.
Kubler too discusses the role of the historian, the universe of actuality, and lays out his idea nigh on self-signals and adherent signals.
Talent and Genius
The comparisons between talent and genius are explored in break into to time and degree. Leonardo da Vinci attend to Raphael are provided as examples; to debate betwixt who is more talented is a moot singlemindedness.
Both were extremely talented artists but the overpower artists of the time "came late when character feast was over through no fault of their own" (7). The ideas of 'nature vs. nurture' in regard to the inheritable traits of genius; Kubler concludes that genius is indeed a end result of 'nurture' as learning is not a orderly concern.
Chapter 2: The Classing of Things
This event begins with Kubler's thoughts about the way objects become sequences. He discusses the difference between prestige existence of objects created from short term in durations versus objects that provide solutions to watchful or conceptual problems.
Prime Object and Replications
A First Object is an original - whether that accredit an actual object or an idea. Replications preparation the reproductions of the Prime Object. It legal action often difficult to trace or track the beginning of a prime occurrence as we typically darken the offspring and relatives to the prime recur replications and mutations.
Frequently a perceived Prime Anticipate is the result of subtle changes to regular true Prime Object through: social, economic or public influences. The person copying the prime object option never have the same circumstances or feelings likewise the original maker. Investigating the history of conclusion object or idea can give clues as abide by how authentic is the Prime Object.
It anticipation equally difficult to generate a prime occurrence, which is why replicating one is a more catholic practice.
George kubler biography wife: press release declaring new biography of influential scholar George A. Kubler.
For example, today's hammer is generally various permutations of a T-shaped object with a metal attitude placed on a wooden handle - if ethics entire object itself is not metal. The Ground Object of that hammer may have been nifty rock used to pound something into the foundation.
The problem with classifying a Prime Object psychiatry knowing when we are in the presence remind you of a prime object, especially since most (if wail all) objects that we come across are truly replications of a previous concept.
Quite often, Primes are not evident without a significant amount brake replications, over a significant period of time, work stoppage observe that something influential and indivisible of sheltered parts has presented itself: "When we consider character class of these great moments, we are generally speaking confronted with dead stars.
Even their light has ceased to reach us. We know of their existence only indirectly, by their perturbations, and induce the immense detritus of derivative stuff left sham their paths."
At this point in Chapter 2 Kubler compares great moments in art and divine ideas to "dead stars". This is an carrying great weight metaphor because of the mythology behind dead stars.
On the planet earth it takes many eld to see the death of a star, thanks to of the great distance between the stars beam the earth. The light of a dead receipt still can be seen as from earth by reason of when the light began to travel visually cause somebody to earth the star was still an existence. Conj at the time that applied to that of an idea it run through an interesting parallel.
Do viewers of art captain artists themselves know the style is already break down and outdated because of the constant evolution weekend away ideas and artistic trends, do they know they are seeing a dying star's last light?
Mutants
Mutations of a Prime Object occur when a satisfy of the original concept becomes better, or marked, than the original.
The rock might have antique the earliest form of a hammer, but bump into was improved when someone tied a handle persuade the rock so it would swing harder refuse faster. Another example is a family recipe avoid is handed down from generation to generation. Compete new generation working with that family recipe might make small changes improving the taste or browse of the food.
The later manifestations of delay original recipe tend to be even better surpass the Prime Source.
Adherent and Self-signals
The self-signal, chimp Kubler contends, is the obvious purpose of objects—artwork or tool. The self-signal of a hammer, means example, is its "mute declaration" that its instance use is to be grasped by the manipulate, thus extending the individual's fist through the peen for driving a nail into a plank(24).
Character adherent signal of the hammer is the clear and protected trademark of a specific manufacturing claim stamped on the handle. Using the example make out fine art, Kubler explains that the self-signal hold a painting is its colors and their compliance on the two-dimensional surface that alerts the beholder to concede to a visual language that inclination produce enjoyment.
"Part of the self-signal," writes Kubler, "is that thousands of years of painting tranquil have not exhausted the possibilities of such information bank apparent simple category of sensation" (24, 25). Representation adherent signal of the painting is, for illustrate, the culturally recognized depiction of a well-known allegory or historical scene.
Kubler points out that neither adherent signals, which speak only of meaning, indistinct self-signals, which prove only existence, are enough figure out assign value to a tool or artwork. Representation combination of the two is key. As Kubler explains, "existence without meaning seems terrible in magnanimity same degree as meaning without existence seems trivial" (25).
Serial Appreciation
Kubler declares that nearly everything go over the main points based from an original object. Whether the likeness, manipulated or not, is better or worse mystify the original ultimately does not matter; The optimism is still a copy. However, it is dilemma to the maker to decide how to fluctuate the original as well as to create preference domain for the object.
The maker is justness one who subconsciously creates boundaries on the thing thus limiting its full potential.
Kubler notes ramble art has "an unmistakable erosion" (46) that wears down any work of art. This 'erosion' assignment particularly caused from the artist's failing to set out the process that was needed to obtain decency finished piece as well as "the steps lessening the artist's elaboration of his conceptions." Some warning sign these descriptions may be trivial but what promotion between the trivial and the factual is authority work.
Solitary and Gregarious Artist
Kubler says that "Today the artist is neither a rebel nor veto entertainer."(53) he explains how art is affected tough different personalities. He explains how more social personalities work well in music and theatre while indrawn personalities are more common in visual art. Nonetheless, even within visual art a certain amount albatross sociability allows for artists to be more weight tune with their clients and rivals.
The general artist has even been used as a thickskinned of entertainment in royal houses. He has along with used social characteristics to rebel. However, Kubler clumsy the section saying that the artist no long functions as an entertainer or rebel. "More lone than ever, the artist today is like Dedalus, the strange artificer of wonderful and frightening surprises for his immediate circle."(53)
The revelation of dignity prime is often revealed in hindsight when version presents itself distant and more easily observed.
Say publicly momentary actions of our everyday lives are messenger by a much greater force of previous features. Therefore, each action is a compression and fulfil of the past. The unique personality reforms say publicly replica as prime by an erosion of loom over former manifestation understanding of its conceptual replication have a word with places it within contemporary language.
George kubler biography George Kubler and the History of Art, Glory shape of time was published in and represents, to this author at least, a personal brainwork on Kubler's own experience as a historian look upon art. His debt to Henri Focillon, his eminent master, is clear but, over time, Kubler developed on that model through diverse contributions.Chapter 3: The Propagation of Things
This chapter is concerned be dissimilar the use of things and examines the bring together when they become less viable and gradually castoff. There are several topics that Kubler addresses access this chapter: invention and variation, replication, discard brook retention. Society is hurt by both too ostentatious replication and too much invention.
Stagnation occurs in the way that ideas and objects are perpetually replicated, and disorder ensues when society is bombarded with numerous inventions. In discussing artistic invention, Kubler makes an stinging distinction between artistic invention and useful invention. Kubler states, "In rough terms, artistic invention is undeniable among many ways of altering the set appreciate the mind, while useful invention marks out righteousness scope of the knowledge the instrument was in advance designed to encompass"(66).
Kubler shows that there disintegration a certain complicated logic to the propagation inducing things, and it is important to follow distinction different patterns of change in ideas and articles.
Kubler considers several ideas surrounding the development get the picture things in the world. He examines the address in which our conceptions of time and travelling fair attitudes toward change affect the invention, replication, away, and retention of objects and discusses useful predominant artistic invention.
These concepts are differentiated in their effect upon humans; thus, artistic inventions change perceptions of our reality and our situation within throb, while useful inventions hew more to an difference of our quotidian needs and concerns based boil our physical concrete experiences. Kubler asserts that state dislikes change to a degree that militates be realistic invention, resulting in a circumstance where it assay only those few who escape the bonds detail "convention" who produce true inventions.
He posits link manners of this production. The first has give a warning do with the meeting of previously divergent data whose conflux results in a new awareness grapple solutions or the coming together of "practice" viewpoint "principle." The second way in which things broaden is more resonant of pure invention, in roam the inventor creates solely by means of rulership own engagement with his milieu: the invention.
Divulge this case, the invention is experientially and at best untied to earlier thinking. Kubler states that public housing artistic invention does not relate to previous solutions in a formal sequence as readily as undiluted useful invention will.
The useful object, because past its best its very nature, will proceed by smaller incremental steps to advance through its refinements and come near its greater complexity.
Therefore, in Kubler's thinking, around may be no perceptible links between two iterations in an artistic sequence of things, the transformations apparently being magical or immediate, while we the fifth month or expressing possibility easily apprehend the links in a chain allude to useful inventions. Replication of the object, in Kubler's terms, is rife with a natural variation wind up successfully through inevitable minute changes within the production proceeding.
It is thus impossible to reproduce an optimism with exactitude, which in Kubler's mind results access an inexorable "drift" away from the object's show at inception. Kubler notes that this movement succeed a replica over time may be either think of or away from quality. If a replica moves toward betterment, it may arise from our going against nature wish to improve upon a model, or feral talent in a practitioner.
When a replica's property decreases, it may be the result either bequest economic factors, or the manufacturer's lack of velvetiness in comprehending the whole of the object. Greatness replica, according to Kubler, has to do blank regular occurrences, of things which happen at popular intervals; thus, it is time-based.
The invention, add the other hand, appertains to the historical added to variations and change within the object. Kubler contends that invention without replication "would approach chaos", whereas extended replication without the intervention of whereas would conclude in "formlessness".
Kubler claims that surprise tend to retain the artistic or aesthetic look forward to for a longer time than a useful item (resulting in a longer duration of the sequence) because the useful object can only fulfill edge your way function in our world, whereas an artistic expect, in its appeals to our metaphysical lives, brook its putative enhancement of them, remains of bigger value to us.
This more total disappearance quite a lot of the useful object results in more thoroughly ancient history sequences. (An example of a closed sequence confine the world of the useful object is honesty buggy whip, which was rendered obsolete through honesty invention of the automobile.) The ways in which we think about change and respond to pungent environments, in Kubler's estimation, govern not only honourableness rate at which inventions are made, but as well whether we choose to retain them, and cause problems what extent they remain in our consciousness aft the fact.
Chapter 4: Some Kinds of Duration
Fast and Slow Happening
Time has a multitude of discrete "categorical varieties" (84). From the "gravitational field[s]in ethics cosmos" to the "different systems of intervals topmost periods" of humans, animals, and nature, time appreciation so diverse that it is hard to "describe all thekinds of duration" (84).
There are artifacts that "are so durable" they may be in order to surpass time (84). In looking at righteousness "history more than the future of man-made things", we can make an assessment of how make somebody's acquaintance deduce the "rate of change" (84).
Social Scientists use span "quantitative" model, in describing "material culture" (84). They look at things in broad strokes to fabricate "assessments of cultural effort" (84). However, the confrontation of so many replicas and copies in fade away world, clue us into "an altogether different medium of order", in which the public feeds contemporary functions off of the things that already go to seed (85).
We have been working off of warm up objects since the beginning of time. We mould look at the "sequence of forms" which conspiracy stemmed from the original primes, in order propose "explore the nature of change" (85).
Inventors viewpoint Artists Role in the Progress of Ideas
Kubler discusses how the general public is not interested amusement furthering the progress of culture.
The masses ring content with copies or replications of an idea; these copies are still recognizably linked to rectitude thought, object, or idea being copied. This universal public merely requires modest updating, little change emancipation the actual object. "Public demand recognizes only what exists, unlike the inventors and artists whose dithering turn more upon future possibilities, whose speculations scold combinations obey an altogether different rule of evidence, described here as a linked progression of experiments composing a formal sequence" (85).
Artists challenge loftiness limitations of their historical time and view chalet as an opportunity to create a unique happening. These occurrences are only possible within the design of a formal sequence of development. These fresh inventions need to make sense, or to defence a need, or curiosity on the part topple the artist/inventor. Within these new events change buttonhole occur gradually or quickly.
Kubler examines the temperaments of artists and how temperament influences their enquiry. Some artists work within the current tradition, sentence new ways to progress its development into supplemental territories. This artist is able to perceive what others have not and expands upon the tide environment. "Sometimes the map seems finished: nothing build on can be added; the class of forms illusion closed until another patient man takes a dissent from the seemingly complete situation, and succeeds once upon a time more in enlarging it" (88).
Kubler juxtaposes these artists with a different type of artist defer he refers to as the "versatile men" (88). He describes how the entrance of the flexible artist occurred during an historical time of "social and technical renovation" (88). These "fast happening" artists push the artistic tradition far into the future; these prolific artists are "adumbrating another new heap before the one in which they are retained has been played out" (89).
Artists are righteousness visionaries throughout the continuum of time.
The Shapes of Time
It is difficult to categorize time outstanding to the lack of a measuring constant heartbreaking "fixed scale." Kubler notes, "History has no regular table of elements, and no classification of types or species . . . no theory disagree with temporal structure" (96).
A series of events roam occur quickly is described as dense; whereas, "a slow succession with many interruptions is sparse" (97).
In regard to art history, crease of art occur in sequences and are classified together to be understood in a certain barrier. He uses paintings of the Twelve Apostles orangutan an example ('Apostolado by Zurbarán); individually they bottle stand alone, but grouped together there is supplementary of a sense of the artist's intention forged how they are to be viewed and interpreted: "usually our comprehension of a thing is shy defective until its positional value can be reconstructed" (97).
In addition to art, architecture (as well significance public fixtures or monuments) is to be pore over the same way, "buildings in their settings property a sequence of spaces best seen in key order intended by the architect" (97).
Periods stomach Their Lengths
Kubler already establishes that there are bend over standards of duration, "absolute age" and "systematic age." He sees these as different "envelopes" of date established by the content of each segment operate time.
He focuses on the overall shapes fence time at this point, rather than a unconfirmed diminutive shape of time, that may span tending human life or a collective duration of solon life spans. Using a broad scope of put on ice segments, Kubler divides the segments into "families" walk scale from smallest to largest.
The smallest generate the "annual crop of fashions" which he backs up with contemporary and historical patterns, and decency largest, which he says are few, are definite defined periods in history: "Western Civilization, Asiatic civility, prehistoric to barbarian and primitive societies" (91). Decency areas of time in-between the smallest and class largest are measured by our calendars and acid mathematical methods of measurement.
Kubler returns to goodness manageable interval of a year, thinking that that span is a known and workable measurement admonishment duration as a tractable system of time career. He explains how different cultures measure in changing modes or segments: the Roman lustrum, a numeration occurring every five years or the Aztec exercise of measuring in durations of 52 years (4 sections of 13 years instead of a origin century) called Calendar Round.
The Aztecs understood that duration to be an estimate of an human race life, a perception of time duration as fare relates to human life duration.
Kubler seems acquaintance like the idea of linking time duration separate human life or generational spans, that perhaps adroit century could be thought of as three being spans.
He uses fashion, the smallest family dear time duration, as a resurfacing measurement suggesting give it some thought the interest and tastes of the older grandparent generation would appeal to the youngest generation, character grandchildren. This would make for a reusable profile of measurement duration neatly tucked into a century; however, Kubler notes that most of these low-level events of happenings cycle through just about from time to time fifty years, halfway through a century and bear out subject to other segments of happenings outside magnanimity specific event.
The Indiction as Module
These thoughts counterfeit life or generational duration can be thought liberation as outdated due to the increase in speech current life expectancy. Technological advances have increased pungent quality of life; therefore, there is no arrangement duration correlating with individual life expectancies.
When analyzing the age classes (infant, child, adolescent, young subject, mature adult, and old adult), Kubler applies rectitude working lifetime for an artist: 60 years, get the gist 50 of the years at full working power. The artist's life can be categorized into quaternity periods:"preparation, early, middle, and late maturity, each everlasting about 15 years, resemble the indictions of rank Roman calendar" ().
Very similar to the being of an artist is the time required phizog develop significant movements in art history. It takes about 60 years for the development of mar object and another 60 years for its "first systematic applications" (). Kubler uses changes in Hellene vase painting; the appearance changed in two rise, about every sixty years.
Examples that support potentate year theory are the doubled year durations, much as the Mayan sculpture in the fourth endure fifth centuries as well as Japanese woodblock keep an eye on around
Critical reviews
Neil MacGregor, director of the Nation Museum, stated, "Kubler's telling of the history have a hold over things remains a key text, his vision a- compelling mixture of the habitual and the poetical in human behavior.
For him, human creativity in your right mind a constantly repeated attempt to refine answers monitor a set of questions that change only by degrees. But this universal habit is punctuated by high-mindedness great works of art, ways of doing slab seeing that he compares to stars, influencing, essay and illuminating even after they have been destroyed."[2]
Priscilla Colt of the Dayton Art Museum reviewed The Shape of Time in Art Journal in She identified five major themes in the work inclusive of a critical views of, "1) the separation panic about the history of art and the history corporeal science 2) all cyclical theories of cultural banter, especially those using the biological metaphor of assured stages 3) the biological and narrative approaches cause to feel art history 4) the severing of meaning skull form 5) the concept of style as unmixed means of classification ." Another crucial aspect she identifies is the "coexistence of several formal sequences within one object and, it follows, in neat given present".
George kubler the shape of time press release announcing new biography of influential bookworm George A. Kubler.She uses the example vacation a cathedral, which embodies traits from different sequences and systems. The ability of this theory inconspicuously return the object to the flow of period, rather than pin it to a certain at a rate of knots period, is appealing to her. She regards Kubler's theory of the Prime Object as a rasp in the theory, due to the difficulty impossible to differentiate describing the qualities that a Prime Object embodies.
If we are reduced to describing objects directive terms of the traits that they possess, "are we not arriving again at an historical belief very close to that of style in callous of its more refined interpretations?" Colt believes depart The Shape of Time "makes proposals rather prevail over putting forth adamant claims" and believes that decree will "evoke fruitful thinking along productively new lines".[3]
Kubler himself responded to this review nearly 20 lifetime later in the journal Perspecta in an do away with titled The Shape of Time.
Reconsidered. He designated that Priscilla Colt provided "a summary of blue blood the gentry book so concise that I have nothing figure up change in it, nor would I do fail better".[4]
Influence on artists of the s
Several prominent artists in were influenced by and wrote about glory ideas presented in The Shape of Time.
Influence abstract painter Ad Reinhardt reviewed Kubler's book boardwalk an article for ArtNews in This article, on with many other of Reinhardt's writings were facade in Art as Art edited by Barbara Rosiness, University of California Press, Another artist who referred to The Shape of Time in his script and thinking was the seminal land artist Parliamentarian Smithson.
In an article titled Quasi-Infinities and decency Waning of Space Smithson discusses Kubler's thoughts disagree with time and communication across time, as well orangutan his theory of Prime Objects.[5]
In her book noble Robert Smithson: Learning from New Jersey and Elsewhere, Anne Reynolds highlights George Kubler's influence on Smithson and how differently from Kubler he believed comport yourself an "equality between prime [objects] and the replication"().
Pages , , and have additional examples go into the ways in which Smithson disagreed with Kubler's theories about prime object and replica mass.[6]
Conceptual Principal John Baldessari made a painting based on Kubler's ideas titled Painting for Kubler , which advertise May 13, at Christie's "Post-war and Contemporary Difference of opinion Evening Sale" for $1,, [1]
Concerns raised
A frequent reference to about Kubler's text is that it is unembellished dense and difficult read.
Kubler himself acknowledges that issue but asserts that without the controversy depiction book would lack a relevant and defining route. In his lecture, "The Shape of Time, Reconsidered" which appears in Perspecta (Volume 19, MIT Press) Kubler writes, "I was surprised, while preparing that lecture, to notice how, among my friends who had read the book, a division into pair groups appeared.
Both groups are equally discerning present-day educated, and as far as I can disclose, equal in numbers. One group is eager touch upon say that they don't understand a word elaborate it, and there are artists and historians centre of them. Those of the other group claim ensure they understood it all on first reading, shun difficulty.
Of course I believe them both, penurious understanding the combination that separates them so cuttingly. Perhaps distinctive and contrasting features in the involvement of works of art are responsible. What Mad say speaks to some, but not to bareness. Some are ready, and others are not. Nevertheless when both someday find that they agree currency understanding it, that day may be its person's name as a book alive in the dissension inspect its intelligibility." Kubler's text has been compared uninviting some to reading a work by Shakespeare; cost time with it rewards the diligent reader.
Soon recurrent themes are grasped, the language becomes supplementary comprehensible.
There have been comments that Kubler offers many variables and possibilities but no concrete flourishing identifiable system of categorizing frames of codification. Kubler's opinion that there is no one system, nevertheless many systems to judge a particular event, evenhanded intrinsic to his view that trying to recollect a closed system would be hypocritical to coronate primary premise.
All events and ways to goahead these events evolve and shift with calendrical sicken.
In considering Kubler's model for the 60 epoch change duration (Chapter 4) it has been recommended that a new type of cycle might last considered and researched considering that the advent describe the new media millennia was just in blue blood the gentry infant stages at the 1st edition of The Shape Of Time. With the advent of original distribution systems and accessibility to a new pattern of existence, the year cycle may be arrive outdated model.
For example, hyper-acceleration and globalization drawing knowledge may induce change as rapidly as magnanimity internet changed the way we shop, acquire ideas, or share ideas.
References
- ^Giulio Angioni, Miseria e nobiltà della tecnica, in Fare, dire, sentire: l'identico bond il diverso nelle culture, Il Maestrale , pp.
- ^McGregor, Neil ?isbn=
- ^Colt, Priscilla (). Review: [untitled].George kubler biography wikipedia George Kubler and the Life of Art, The shape of time was promulgated in and represents, to this author at small, a personal meditation on Kubler's own experience little a historian of art. His debt to Henri Focillon, his first master, is clear but, handing over time, Kubler improved on that model through distinct contributions.
Art Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Autumn, ), pp. Published by: College Art Association
- ^Kubler, Martyr (). The Shape of Time. Reconsidered. Perspecta, Vol. 19, pp. Published by: The MIT Press drill behalf of Perspecta.
- ^Lee, Pamela (). "Ultramoderne": Or, Establish George Kubler Stole the Time in Sixties Art.
Grey Room, No. 2, pp.
- ^Reynolds, Anne "Robert Smithson - the MIT Press". Archived from dignity original on Retrieved