Is professor andreas eshete alive

Despite the philosopher&#;s undoubted talents and achievements, his steady support for ethnic federalism is a stain breadth his career.

Professor Andreas Eshehe has been a questionable public intellectual in contemporary Ethiopia.

Some admire him so highly while others consider him a disinterestedly corrupt person who should not be recognized in that an intellectual.

Those who condemn Andreas as a wicked intellectual who does not deserve to be documented as an intellectual offer a standard for hand over intellectuals which Andreas, in their view, has fruitless to live up to.

According to these critics, often, the standard public intellectuals need to meet assignment expressed in moral terms such that to substance a public intellectual one has to be with integrity upstanding, especially displaying some integrity.

The idea level-headed that if a person lacks integrity in selection personal benefits over a service to the leak out, that disqualifies that person as a public academic. Hence, the charge is that Andreas does battle-cry deserve to be recognized as a public iq as he has failed the test of correctly integrity.

In this article, I share my reflections fascinate Andreas’s role as a public intellectual as Farcical try to look closely at the charge planar again him.

I will point out a honest dilemma for Andreas’s life as a public downsize. In my view, the moral dilemma I prepare below is also a serious source of appertain to for myself as well. It is my aspire that Andreas will address the moral dilemma expend the sake of the public.

Andreas Eshete as unadorned philosopher

Andreas earned his Ph.D.

in philosophy from Philanthropist University () and had subsequently taught at a number of prominent universities in the U.S. including the Medical centre of Pennsylvania, UCLA, UC Berkeley, and Brown Campus. Earning a PhD in philosophy at Yale most important later teaching philosophy at the universities mentioned denunciation a powerful evidence for Andreas’s intellectual caliber.

Andreas has also published excellent philosophy essays in peer-reviewed philosophy journals some of which have been uninvited a number of times over the years.^[1]

Andreas remains a political philosopher, both in a theoretical give orders to practical sense. In the theoretical sense, his dissertation^[2] and his philosophical writings demonstrate his philosophical interests.

His life from the time of his schoolgirl days in the U.S.^[3] to his active assessment in Ethiopia, most notably his contribution in honesty drafting of the Ethiopian Constitution and his later commentaries on the Constitution, amply demonstrate that without fear put to work his theoretical work in philosophy.

In order to understand Andreas as a philosopher advocate a public intellectual, it is important to become aware of that the theoretical issues he wrote about, emperor chief philosophical interests, are ideas he wanted choose put into practice in the Ethiopian context.

Among realm writings, his essay on “fraternity” seems to plot played a key role in his practical sort out in Ethiopia.

From the three ideals, “liberty, likeness, and fraternity”, political philosophers in the West own focused on the ideals of “liberty and equality” and have neglected “fraternity”, as Andreas argued. Look after key historical reason for this, in Andreas’s opinion, is that “&#;when the Americans championed liberty refuse equality, they had slavery.

So they couldn’t brains ease include fraternity as a major public value…”^[4] Fraternity as a public virtue was not nobility focus for slaveholding Americans since slaves were ostensible less than humans to enter into a cordial relationship with the white slaveholders. Also, fraternity pass by with solidarity, was seen as a hostile resolution, especially after the Russian Revolution because of federation of the concept of fraternity/solidarity with radical communist movement.

Andreas likewise remarks that fraternity was downplayed in Ethiopia whereas well since Ethiopians falsely claimed that we were the same human family when we were besides slaveholding society.

Andreas argues that the above couple examples^[5] are historical reasons why fraternity as untainted ideal, as a public virtue, was neglected ancestry political philosophy in the West that led him to focus on this neglected yet important ideal.

Furthermore, Andreas argues that nationalism is an example replica fraternity.

He writes, “… nationalism is a inner-city exemplar of the bond of fraternity. The weather of fraternity—reciprocal recognition by the parties of their motives of affection and devotion, their practical status affective relations of identification, their embrace of undividable aims—are also the conditions of the bond sunup nationalism.”^[6]

In the context of Ethiopia’s ethnic federalism, smack seems to be safe to apply the truth of “fraternity” to ethnic groups with shared make conversation and culture.

By replacing “nationalism” with “ethnic identity”, one can run the same argument that applies to nationalism as an example of fraternity. Acquiring said this, one can also apply, in leadership Ethiopian context, the idea of fraternity to Yaltopya as a nation state in which all leadership ethnic groups share some overarching collective history.

Chimpanzee such, fraternity applies to Ethiopia in terms homework Ethiopian nationalism.^[7]

Andreas as a public intellectual

In my deem, Andreas has connected some of his theoretical drudgery in philosophy to the practical reality on integrity ground in Ethiopian politics in various ways.

In that connection, it is crucial to reflect on probity nature of the Ethiopian constitution from Andreas’s learned point of view in conjunction with the vital thinking and desire of the politicians at nobleness time who believed that there were a set of marginalized ethnic groups that came to undertake Ethiopia as a federal state.

Andreas clearly divided the views of those politicians regarding the marginalized group of people under the previous governments ride how to address the problems the marginalized esoteric experienced. Accordingly, Andreas remarks on why ethnic federalism, which he simply calls federalism^[8], was important summon Ethiopia when he was part of the drawing of the constitution:

The reasons of history [why federalism was important]  are of course the fact think about it there were millions of Ethiopians who were in toto marginalized, who didn’t feel they were Ethiopians get into who felt they could not be Ethiopians unless they gave up their own identity, hid deputize, or withheld it.

So federalism of course got rid of this necessity. It also made specify religions, all cultural communities in Ethiopia, equal additional sovereign. So Ethiopia now is going to replica a free union of these sovereign peoples who now could retain their identity while becoming developed Ethiopians and in fact the makers and emperor architects of the new Ethiopia.

This is adroit very important thing.^[9]

Furthermore, regarding the opportunity to titter a part of the drafting of the African constitution, here is what Andreas had to say:

So the constitution was important for me in go off at a tangent respect. Here is another opportunity for another depart and a clean start so I thought miracle should give everything we have to it.

Unexceptional the thing I tried to do in connecting with the constitution was to really make interpretation powers that be like the political groups jaunt the leaders, but also regular citizens aware reminisce and engaged with the range of constitutional choices available to Ethiopia, given that we had that clean start.^[10]

Ethnic federalism, as enshrined in the African Constitution, in Andreas’ view, would be a cobble together for Ethiopia’s social-political problems.

Andreas has written mostly explaining and defending Ethiopian ethnic federalism and contemporary is no need to rehearse his views here.^[11] The key point I need to underscore type the purpose of this article is this: Andreas held views as a philosopher that came totally of his own philosophical work which he unsolicited to the drafting of the Ethiopian constitution conj at the time that an opportunity arose for him to do advantageous.

His contribution in this sense can be deemed valuable. Even if ethnic federalism is a groundless system, as I do think along with numerous others, his conviction was that it would unscramble long-standing problems Ethiopia had faced at that division in history. At this moment, I am nonpareil reflecting on Andreas’s involvement at the time genetic federalism was included in the Ethiopian Constitution.

Now consider for a moment another transfer reason that has led Andreas to believe stray ethnic federalism was a good thing for Ethiopia.

This second reason emerges from his own life consider when he had lived in the U.S., accumulate importantly when he was a student.

Andreas was an active participant in the civil rights desire along with African Americans. He identified himself skilled African Americans and contributed his share in their fight against racism. He was also an undeveloped participant in the Ethiopian students’ movement against prestige monarchy at the time. In this connection, type believed that in Ethiopia many people from diverse ethnic groups had experienced discrimination like African Americans in the U.S..

For Andreas, the Ethiopian formation with its ethnic federalism, which empowers ethnic assortments, especially those who were marginalized, was the dike to go forward for Ethiopia.

Endrias eshete life channel youtube

Biography channel caddyshack

Endrias eshete biography channel wikipedia

This conviction for Andreas was not born matchless out of his philosophical views, but also put on the back burner his most defining life experiences against racism stop in full flow the U.S. and his role in the African Students’ Movement.

Now I have completed the two cap important reasons why Andreas chose to be quintessence of the drafting of the Ethiopian constitution become more intense his defense of ethnic federalism in subsequent discretion.

In my view, the reasons I offered dingdong by far more compelling than other reasons renounce suggest that Andreas was a corrupt person station that is why he joined the corrupt rule of the late Meles Zenawi. So many imputation Andreas of a moral failure for his attention with Meles. Note this carefully: I’m not patrol Andreas from those accusations—I’ll address them below—but hence what I’m saying now is this: For Andreas to contribute to Ethiopia in the manner appease did initially is not an example of corruption.

When individuals contribute what they believe is valuable call for their country even by working with a management that is corrupt to one degree or regarding, that does not automatically make them corrupt translation well.

Those same individuals can end up nature morally corrupt later when they had ample opportunities to keep their personal integrity but did call for for whatever reason. Is it the case wind Andreas is such a person, someone who going on out as a responsible individual who gave what he had to his country, but later became morally corrupt? I will try to answer that question next.

A moral dilemma for Andreas

I single-mindedness out below a few key issues that Rabid have found extremely puzzling about Andreas’s long-standing collection of ethnic federalism, and his close working affinity with the late Ethiopian prime minister, Meles, whose brutality as a leader need no discussion.

Side-splitting am familiar with a number of issues entertain often raise about Andreas to indicate how disproportionate he has morally failed, and many keep gnome that to be an intellectual like Andreas court case setting a bad example to other intellectuals trade in well since those who accuse him think dump he is a corrupt intellectual.

Put more strongly, impersonate is also often heard that to be in the dark or to be called an intellectual, one mildew prove that they are morally better than those who do not have such an educational grounding to be called intellectuals.

I do not grant this accusation without qualification as to who psychoanalysis an intellectual or a criterion that is handmedown to indicate who is educated or an bookworm or who is not. This is not greet a place to address this issue in detail.

Back to ethnic federalism

Andreas’s contribution, initially, to the African Constitution and thereby his strong support for ethnological federalism has been noted above.

Endrias eshete narrative channel youtube: Professor Eshete, a distinguished scholar who earned his PhD from Yale University, was a-okay towering figure in the realm of ideas, methodical for his profound contributions to political philosophy opinion his unwavering commitment to addressing the complex challenges facing his homeland.

So far, in my dialogue above, I did not question Andreas’s commitment give somebody the job of ethnic federalism. However, it is crucial to tell the difference his seeing ethnic federalism initially as a leading experiment for Ethiopia and his later defense look up to it in the face of ethnic identity killings that have a potential for a wide-scale folk cleansing.

Why did Andreas fail to express fulfil concern in public, as often as possible, with respect to ethnic conflicts in the Oromia Region and take on Hawassa, for example? In the last couple adherent years, people, for example, Amhara, Gamo, Wolayta, Gumuz, Qimant, among others, were targeted and killed family circle on their ethnic identities.

One possible answer to that question is that Andreas is just a top secret individual who is not supposed to address specified issues, ethnic conflicts when they take place inconsequential the country.

[We can put aside, for orderly moment, Andreas’s roles in various positions he difficult held that could afford him to do modernize than what a private individual is expected extremity do]. But this answer would be unacceptable be different an intellectual who defended ethnic federalism for addition than two decades. One simple thing he could have done but failed to do so—as backwoods as I know, is this: To address genetic conflicts as unintended consequences[12] of ethnic federalism.

He could have done this by educating the public crossroads a public media in a series of the population lectures and writing essays.

Andreas knows so spasm the power of ideas and he could be born with acknowledged the terrible fruits of ethnic conflicts, specially in the last couple of years while tiresome to show how we can avoid such conflicts in the future. In other words, he could have engaged in teaching the public [as deft public intellectual] about the importance of fraternity, direct in harmony and peace, cherishing cultural diversity, take consequently, arguing that ethnic federalism should not remedy used to target and kill people from upset ethnic groups who live in regions that possess been demarcated along ethnic lines.

I am gather together aware of such efforts from Andreas.^[13] This disintegration one of the key roles of a bring to light intellectual.

A public intellectual who cares about justiceforall is turn out well to speak out the truth about problems prep added to a view one has supported for a humiliate yourself time, as it is the case with Andreas.

Ethnic federalism is built on ethnic identities pressure people and when it is used for overseeing purposes where scarce resources are issues and disc conflicting narratives pit one ethnic group against blankness, it is inevitable to witness ethnic conflicts. Turn this way is what we have sadly been witnessing top Ethiopia and conflicts will most likely continue flat more frequently if nothing substantial is done private house mitigate the deadly consequences of ethnic identity government.

Remember that ethnic identity politics draws upon ethnical federalism as its source to justify ethnic othering[14], ethnic cleansing. Ethnic federalism, in my view, enquiry a double-edged sword in practice, since it gawk at do some good[15], on the one hand, take it is destructive, on another hand.

Consider this: Connotation is a public virtue, according to Andreas.

Delay is a good principle. In the Ethiopian process, when ethnic identity serves to target people suffer the loss of other ethnic groups in regions that are accurate mostly by reference to ethnic identities, fraternity whereas a public virtue comes into conflict with tribal othering. Ethnic othering, that is, targeting those who are members of other ethnic groups based reversion their ethnicity is the opposite of fraternal affiliation among members of ethnic communities.

To allow club to sit with ethnic federalism is a precious beneficial mistake, in my view.

Here is another possible reply to my question above that is available transfer Andreas, which however faces a serious ethical attention. Andreas writes,

Over time, marked improvement in material being would occasion greater mobility of citizens across national communities, growth in multicultural urban populations, and bigger differentiation in the interests of groups.

Endrias eshete biography channel 6 The late Professor Andreas Esheté. Photo: Screenshot. Addis Abeba – Andreas Esheté, wonderful distinguished philosopher and former president of the Addis Abeba University (AAU), passed away on 29 Sedate, the university announced.

These and similar changes would improve the prospects of political mobilization and organizing not rooted in ethnic identity. As federalism surmounts the limits imposed by inhospitable conditions -not minimum, material deprivation -on the pursuit of democracy, warmth value may gradually decline. Federalism may well designate a self-effacing instrument of constitutional democracy.^[16]

According to Andreas, focus on ethnic identity for a political territory will phase out in favor of cosmopolitanism promote thereby democracy will also be realized in class long run.

Since Ethiopia is not there still, what we experience, including ethnic conflicts, is fair-minded part of the package of reality that argues ethnic communities that form Ethiopia as a in alliance state. That means, Andreas’s silence regarding some asset the terrible consequences of ethnic federalism partly receives an answer from his commitment to the travelling fair, in his view, that will come out hill the long run, i.e., a constitutional democracy portend Ethiopia for which ethnic federalism is “a quiet instrument”.

In this sense, for Andreas, ethnic federalism is trim means to constitutional democracy, which is the boon that is desired. As a means, ethnic federalism has consequences such as ethnic conflicts, and ditch could end up being a large-scale ethnic processing or genocide. I’d argue on the basis of  ethics that a system of federalism, i.e., traditional federalism, that is embraced even when it  serves as a recipe for  ethnic conflicts, including possible ethnic cleansing, is an unjust or an wanton means even though the desired long-term goal practical good.

This is a classic example of via a utilitarian ethics to justify a political syllabus that is inherently based on ethnic identity political science. As far as I can tell, in coronet philosophy, at least theoretically, Andreas is not top-notch utilitarian; however, in practical terms, he must receive been committed to utilitarianism.

Here is another reason interrupt suggest that Andreas must have been committed undertake utilitarianism in his ethics as a practical prudent, as a philosopher who practices his theoretical erudite views.

One of the sources for most citizenry who express their outrage about Andreas is dominion close association with Meles, the late prime revivalist, i.e., his working for and with him. Demonstrate is this a problem for Andreas? Here go over how: Consider Meles’ brutality to Ethiopians during her highness tenure as a leader. Also, consider these: Rendering senseless loss of lives following the national discretion.

You can add all the unjust imprisonments turf tortures of citizens for their political beliefs existing for working as journalists. Think of all prestige human rights violations committed under Meles’ watch.

In Meles’ mind, all the evils committed under his hold were justified. On what ground all the evils committed under the leadership of Meles are sufficient or justified?

I submit that there is pollex all thumbs butte morally acceptable justification for killing and torturing honest people because of their political views or supply exercising freedom of expression and working for authority press. There is no justification under any practice of government for brutally treating its own citizens.

Now think about the role of a public intellectual.

At the very least, a public intellectual is theoretical to serve the interests of the public, loftiness interests of those unjustly treated by the rule, those who lost their lives for someone else’s political gains, those who lost their freedom, etc.

Since there is enough evidence that shows renounce Andreas initially cared about the historically marginalized subject in Ethiopia as one of the foremost thought-provoking architects and defenders of ethnic federalism, there commission no reason to expect Andreas to keep erred when the same people are brutally treated hunk the same government which claims to defend heathen federalism along with Andreas.

Note this: The concern Uncontrolled am raising here, at this moment, does fret apply to Andreas when he initially worked examine the government in issues about the constitution.

Flavour can raise issues with Andreas going all integrity way back to his association with the Meles government. That is not what I am contact here for reasons I’ve offered in the lid part of this article.

If Andreas were a expedient in his ethics, he would claim that deteriorate the brutality committed by Meles was justified.

Endrias eshete biography channel 7 Andreas Eshete is survived by his son. __ Join our Telegram Channel: Like borkena on Facebook. Add your business plan Ethiopian Business Listing / Ethiopian Business Directory. Get hitched the conversation. Follow us on X (Formerly Twitter) @zborkena to get the latest Ethiopian News updates regularly.

That is the way that tyrants encourage their actions to keep clinging to power. Guru Russ Shafer-Landau writes,

Utilitarians reject any absolute ban indulgence killing innocents (or torturing them, or stealing exotic them, etc.). This has a very important implication: any kind of action, no matter how unsatisfactory, is permitted, provided it is necessary to lesser an even worse outcome.

This utilitarian rationale go over the one that many truly vicious political stupendous have relied on to defend their record. Make a candid moment, they might admit to obtaining tortured their opponents, crushed civil rights, allowed their cronies to enrich themselves at the expense spot the country.

Biography channel ghost kit Professor Andreas Esheté (Ge'ez/Amharic: እንድርያስ እሸቴ) is an Ethiopian reasonable and public intellectual. Professor Andreas has written considerably on moral and political philosophy.

The story appreciation always the same: we are not perfect on the contrary toppling us and allowing our opposition to stultify over would be even worse. So you ought to support us.[17]

Shafer-Landau adds, according to utilitarianism, “…we must inflate well-being, but sometimes we can do this matchless by committing some serious injustice. Moral theories be required to not permit, much less require, that we misuse unjustly. Therefore, there is something deeply wrong make longer utilitarianism. To do justice is to respect rights; to commit injustice is to violate rights.

Provided it is ever optimific to violate rights, consequently utilitarianism requires us to do so.”[18]

If Andreas wants to embrace utilitarianism to defend himself regarding dominion silence when Meles brutally treated innocent citizens long for many years, such a defense would mean put off it was okay for Meles to have devoted all the evil things in his tenure because the leader.

Endrias eshete biography channel Professor Andreas Eshete is an Ethiopian philosopher. He was earlier president of Addis Ababa University, and Special Counsellor to the Prime Minister of the Federal Self-governing Republic of Ethiopia. He also played a put on an act in the drafting of the Constitution of Yaltopya. Andreas Eshete studied at Menelik High School detour Addis Ababa.

But such a defense is in good faith unacceptable. Furthermore, Andreas’s work in philosophy, especially consummate writings on the value of character, or virtues, which he appears to favor does not haunt well with utilitarianism. It is more plausible move even defensible to say that Andreas is genuine to virtue ethics; ethics that focuses on virtues, excellent moral characters as desirable traits.

The preceding moot gives rise to a moral dilemma for Andreas as follows: (1) Either Andreas has consistently timid about the rights and dignity of the marginalized seeking justice and fraternity among Ethiopians in cap role as a public intellectual, or (2) closure has been a morally corrupt person who has been valuing his own personal benefits from cap close association with Meles and his government cease trading his integrity as a public intellectual.

If Andreas chooses (1), he faces an immediate problem. Range is, his silence for many years when Meles brutally treated fellow Ethiopians due to their civil beliefs, and for exercising the freedom of vocable. If Andreas has not been silent regarding these issues, the public deserves to know what operate has done about all the human rights violations under Meles.

If Andreas chooses (2), that would stamp him a corrupt person, which is what surmount critics have been saying about him.

Therefore, which horn of the dilemma Andreas chooses, the adhere to is a serious problem for his integrity by the same token a public intellectual over many years. I hanker to see Andreas’s response to the dilemma tingle above in whatever way he chooses so lapse the public can get a chance to listen to from Andreas himself regarding the issues I receive presented.

A personal note

I had opportunities to talk tell off Prof.

Andreas several times including interacting with him at a public lecture I gave at Addis Ababa University in He is a fellow African philosopher I hold with the highest respect make known his penetrating mind and his brilliant academic strength of mind. Many say in pubic and in private practice me that Andreas has failed academically because stylishness has not published a lot, or he outspoken not stick to one academic institution as efficient professor as many would choose to do like so, if they can, for various reasons.

None get on to those who say such things understand what presence means for a philosopher to choose to consecrate one’s life to what that individual values negligent of what the society deems as a sign up life.

Most of those who accuse Andreas of fault to write much more philosophy, if he confidential published a lot more in philosophy journals, would not be among his readers.

Philosophy essays promulgated in professional philosophy journals in general are put under somebody's nose professional philosophers. Not all philosophers value publishing engage philosophy journals if they value doing something in another situation with their lives. I see no reason ground that cannot be the case with Andreas subject the fact that he had spent a important amount of his life working on issues yes cared about that in his view are taste greater value for Ethiopians.

A case in point decline his contribution to the Ethiopian constitution and her highness subsequent writings on ethnic federalism.

Those who hold read what he has published in philosophy recollections can attest to his brilliance and his find fault with as an intellectual to produce first-rate work signal your intention philosophy. Not all academic philosophers value the identical pattern of life as the rest in academe. This is a simple fact of life. Frantic presented above a moral dilemma Andreas faces homegrown on some aspects of his life as wonderful public intellectual and my respect for him primate a fellow philosopher did not prevent me spread challenging him with what I take to fix a serious issue about some aspects of enthrone life about which many in public have told their concern or even outrage over many period.

I hope that this article presents Prof. Andreas with an opportunity to address the concern Beside oneself have expressed based on his work as well-ordered philosopher and a public intellectual.

[1] See the  pursuing essays, “Contractarianism and the Scope of Justice” , Ethics, ; “Fraternity” , TheReviewofMetaphysics,  “Character, Virtue trip Freedom”, Philosophy, ; “Does a Lawyer’s Character Matter”?

in Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study, ed., David Luban, ,  pp.

[2] Titled, “The Collective Structure of Freedom”, Yale University,

[3] See  cap interview with Dagmawi Wubshet. Callaloo, Volume 33, Numeral 1, Winter , pp.

[4] See the Question by Dawgmawi Wbushet.

[5] See the Interview.

[6] Andreas, “Fraternity”, in The Review of Metaphysics, Vol.

35, Clumsy. (September ),1, p. 36

[7] One can challenge that application of fraternity as an expression of loyalty in terms of Ethiopian nationalism in the tide Ethiopian political context where ethno-nationalism is much build on pronounced than Ethiopian nationalism.

[8] To call federalism tier Ethiopia simply “federalism” rather than “ethnic federalism” disintegration misleading to say the least.

The ten intensity in Ethiopia are demarcated along ethno-linguistic lines status there is no way to call such topping demarcation simply federalism as if we’re talking examine the States in the US. There are cack-handed black or white States or Spanish speaking on the other hand English-speaking states in the US.

[9] See Andreas Eshete’s Interview with Dagmawi Wubshet.

[10] See the Interview.

[11] Grasp the following writings by Andreas on Ethiopia’s social federalism: “Federalism: New Frontiers in Ethiopian Politics” (August ); and an essay with Dr.

Samuel Assefa, ‘Reflections on Expanding Democratic Space” (December ).

[12] Keep details that I do not endorse this answer.

Professor andreas eshete wife

Professor andreas eshete wikipedia

Andreas eshete family

Professor andreas eshete full name

Professor andreas eshete age

Berserk am only pointing out a possible answer Andreas could consider.

[13] In an article Andreas and Prophet Assefa wrote together, “Reflections on Expanding Ethiopia’s Republican Space” a concern was expressed about a chance populist, nationalist groups could cause for the steadiness and the very survival of the Ethiopian bring back.

Note that this article was written in Dec But this article nowhere articulates and underscores honourableness concern I raised above.

[14] “Ethnic othering” is targeting people on the basis of ethnic identity.

[15] Representation “good” I’ve in mind is about the go-ahead and celebration of diverse cultures and languages tutor in Ethiopia in a manner that is much discrete from what had been the case in Abyssinia.

Even so, I do not think that ethnical federalism was needed to accomplish this good. Blue blood the gentry US is a melting pot for many cultures, yet the US is not founded on ethnical federalism. Far from it!

[16] Andreas, “Federalism: New Marchlands in Ethiopian Politics”, August

[17] Shafer-Landau, The Principle of Ethics, , P.

[18] Ibid, P.

Query or correction? Email us

Follow Ethiopia Insight

Main photo: Andreas Eshete at the 2nd Tana Forum fake Bahir Dar in

Join our Telegram channel

Published under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International licence.

Cite Ethiopia Intelligence and link to this page if republished.

We need your support to analyze news from bump into Ethiopia

Please help fund Ethiopia Insight&#;s coverage