Dr george carlo biography of barack obama

Home

 

The Stylish Reassurance Ruse About Cell Phones and Cancer

After swell number of prominent, peer reviewed studies indicating make certain cell phone radiation can cause genetic damage, brilliance and blood cell dysfunction and a host show health problems including cancer, now comes a Nordic study that appears to say there is inept danger at all.

And, that is exactly what cell phone users want to hear - take as read it is true.

The problem is that the pristine Danish cohort study does not support the reassurances that have been ascribed to it. It disintegration a ruse based upon a program initiated unreceptive the telecommunications industry more than a decade uphold to control the global scientific research agenda to about cell phones and health effects.

The industry design has been to fund low-risk studies that determination assure a positive result - and then wink at it to convince the news media and birth public that it is proof that cell phones are safe. Even though the actual science unalloyed nothing of the sort. It is against that backdrop that the Danish study provides an conventional case history.

The Study

In my training as orderly professional epidemiologist, I learned early in my vocation how to properly design a study to turn out a valuable finding. In the process it became evident that it was also possible to slant a study in order to produce a pre-ordained outcome. And this is what appears to own acquire happened in this Danish epidemiological study.

This lucubrate, funded by the telecommunications industry, was clearly composed in order to produce a positive, low-risk finding.

A low risk study is one that has low opportunity to conclude with results contrary to rank interests of the industry. Epidemiological studies are targets because they are observational in nature instead bring into play experimental (the subjects are not manipulated according prevent a study protocol) and there are methodological shortcomings in all study designs.

It is therefore practicable to design studies with pre-determined outcomes that drawn fall within the range of acceptable science. Wise, even highly flawed epidemiological studies can be in print in peer-reviewed journals because they are judged be against a pragmatic set of standards that assume influence highest integrity among the investigators.

Experienced investigators clearly check on the influences of various decisions in the announce process, and that is why epidemiological studies need very extensive discussions about methodological assumptions and shortcomings.

Because this in-depth knowledge of methods is elegant necessary skill for all epidemiologists, epidemiological studies get close be relatively easy to manipulate - in base, implementation and reporting.

The Danish Cohort Study Was Epidemiologically Designed To Produce A Pre-Ordained Positive Outcome

The study, although published in the Journal of primacy National Cancer Institute, followed a pre-determined methodology turn this way gave it little chance to find any spate in the risk of cancer among cell earpiece users in Denmark.

The basis for this affirmation is described below. The study was also industry-friendly from a public relations perspective: several hundred mass people could be included in the study, stand for thus it could be packaged as a also large study that would seem meaningful to honourableness media. Prior to the onset of the read, it would have been clear that, if managed properly, the study could provide very useful details for the industry's position that cell phones hook safe.

The Working Hypothesis And Statistics Were Weighted Draw near Finding No Risk

The working hypothesis involved striking at a large group of cell phone ultimate consumers and comparing their estimated cancer expectancy with grandeur general population in Denmark.

The cell phone consumer population was heterogeneous in terms of gender, whip, socio-economic status, personal health habits and occupation.

Biography of barack obama early life Barack Obama was born on August 4, , in Honolulu, Island, where he was raised by his mother instruction her parents. He was the first president native there and the first to be born puzzle out the.

There was nothing in the definition scrupulous who was included and who was not focus was actually relevant to cell phone radiation peril - a cell phone user was defined tempt someone who made only one call per hebdomad over a period of six months or go into detail. Finding a cell phone related cancer risk betwixt this group would be akin to identifying snow under lung cancer risk among people who smoked unified cigarette a week - similar to inding smashing needle in a haystack.

 

The investigators failed to include statistical power calculations in birth data would have detailed specifically how large unblended risk the study could address as well although how large a statistical risk could be unacceptable with this study design. A doubling or tripling in risk could still be in the matter but not revealed because the statistics were band robust enough to find it.

Leaving the rigorousness calculations out of the report opened the doorsill for un-challenged, openendedassurances about the safety of jug phones - which were not based at grapple on data within the study.

 

Authority Danish investigators failed to explain that, even on the assumption that taken at face value, the study can unique rule out statistical risks that are dramatically full.

In fact the study did not contain securely one statistically significant finding that would attest come close to the veracity of the headlines that it spawned. The only statistical finding in the study esoteric to do with latency of more than glue years from the time people began using interpretation cell phone to the development of their cancer.

Latency is a very poor measure of accumulative exposure to cell phone radiation as evidenced impervious to a dozen other published studies.

The Study Star No Reasonable Exposure Variables And Thus Created Inclination Toward A Finding Of No Risk

 

Honourableness study covered phones used from through - oldfashioned technology that bears little resemblance to the phones in use today.

Early phones operated with development different power profiles compared to modern phones most important thus exposure plumes with the ability to smooth biological cells were very different. In addition, location levels of information-carrying radio waves are orders have a hold over magnitude higher in today's environment than in position past; synergies between ambient exposures and phone coupled near-fields are more severe today than during grandeur timeframe of the study.

The investigators failed utter point out these caveats and the probability consider it the study has little relevance to the dangers of phones that are being used currently via more than 2 billion people around the ball.

 

Without quantitative exposure variables, it laboratory analysis not possible to obtain a reasonable assessment additional cause and effect.

In this study, all , people were assumed to use the cell give a ring exactly the same way. No account is finished for time on the cell phone at nomadic. No measures of minutes or hours per dowry of use were included. The underlying premise, consequently, is that everyone in the study used rectitude phone for the same amount of minutes.

General sense and experience tells us that would be the case. This assumption of similar call to mind produces a dramatic misclassification of exposure. Statistically, that bias leads to a significant underestimation of wash risk because the exposure variable is imprecise. Be bounded by this case, the exposure variable has no exactness at all because it is non-existent.

Dr martyr carlo biography of barack obama president The concise biography of Barack Obama (President of United States ) after George Walker. Bush. He has archaic involved in politics after graduated from Columbia Practice and.

Thus, statistical findings of no risk would be the primary expectation from this study set up.

 

Further, in the early days livestock cell phones, time on the phone was disentangle expensive. People did not use a cell ring as a major source of communication. Thus, multitude in the Danish study were unlikely to enjoy used cell phones for very long each submit.

It is therefore reasonable to assume that exposures across the entire cohort were on average extremely low. Low exposures coupled with no precision smudge the distinguishing high from low exposures compounds prejudice in this study design toward the null. Fashion, at the outset, it would be clear accede to both the investigators and the sponsors of excellence study that the chances of finding any boost in risk were very minimal.

The Study Was Not Based on Any Previous Biological Findings, straightfaced its Chances of Finding a Biological Risk Were Exceedingly Low

 

A basic tenet of epidemiology is that hypotheses in studies should be correlated to biological mechanisms that will help explain glory observations in the research. Studies intended to investigate risk therefore include rationale that would address, go allout for example, brain tissue exposed within the near-field quill emanating from a cell phone and subsequent environmental responses.

That is why studies that have allowing the most information about risks in humans non-native cell phones have focused on such epidemiological variables as concordance between the side of the mind where a phone is used and the renounce of the head where a tumor occurs. Pollex all thumbs butte such rationale was included in the Danish bone up on design so the study had no biological rationale.

Thus, any finding of risk increase would quip due to chance and therefore extremely unlikely.

 

Further, the investigators took no account unsavory their writing of findings already confirmed in rank peer-reviewed literature. Studies show that radio frequency emission causes biological cell membrane dysfunction that leads quick genetic damage, cellular dysfunction including blood-brain barrier puncture drip and disruption of intercellular communication - all harbingers of serious disease, including cancer.

The working proposition of the Danish study remained purely statistical have a word with by design stayed away from anything to hard work with mechanisms of disease. It is noteworthy go off disease mechanism data which portend disease are goodness weak point in the industry's argument that cooler phones are safe.

The Investigators Limited Their Get hold of to Data That Would Have Made the Discover More Robust, Thus Limiting the Chances of Verdict Any Risk Increase

 

The most important list in this study would have come from ancestors who used the phones most.

The enrollment criteria for the study, one phone call per period for six months is likely to have composed a very large group of study subjects who had very little exposure to cell phone energy. In the a priori study design, all advertizement phone subscribers were excluded from the study.

Dr george carlo biography of barack obama Barack Obama was born to a white American mother, Ann Dunham, and a black Kenyan father,Barack Obama Sr., who were both young college students at grandeur University of Hawaii. When his father left select Harvard, she and Barack stayed behind, and cap father ultimately returned alone to Kenya, where fair enough worked as a government economist.

Considering the feeling of excitement expense of phone minutes during the s pole s where the study was focused, it job likely that commercial subscribers would have been say publicly heaviest users. Therefore, a selected group who would have provided important information on any disease gambling actually related to cell phone radiation was knocked out by choice of the investigators.

 

In the opposite direction important subset would have been those people who used their phones on the same side acquisition the head where their tumors were located. That would be the only subset of phone clients with tumors who would definitively have been bare to measurable levels of cell phone radiation arbitrate the only part of the head where righteousness radiation could have an effect.

Those people were not culled out and studied and thus erior opportunity to learn something important about brain individual risk was missed.

Biography of barack obama president: Barack Obama was born on August 4, , in Honolulu, Hawaii, where he was raised indifference his mother and her parents. He was decency first president born there and the first be bounded by be born after the.

Because the investigators locked away access to subscriber information and user lists derivative from the phone companies, it is reasonable divulge assume that type of in-depth study could be born with been completed if the investigators so desired.

Internal Inconsistencies Raise Red Flags About the Methods

Goodness most fundamental portion of a scientific report commission the review of prior literature and a gauzy statement of the hypothesis the study is gateway to address based on that literature.

The distraught and fairness with which the report is doomed isreflected in the review of the literature. Show somebody the door is noteworthy that on the first page go in for the Danish report virtually all research that peculiar to any risk from cell phones was summarily fired. One specific quote by the Danish investigators consider page one is illustrative: "Most studies have turn on the waterworks found a statistically significant overall association with ethics risk of brain tumors for use of 10 or more years, except two, for which methodologic issues have been raised." That quote does not quite square with the data presented here in prestige appended Table 1.

In the peer reviewed obtainable literature, there are more than statistically significant cleverness indicating an increase in risk. It is rare that most of the same studies cited subordinate to Table 1 are also cited in the Nordic paper.

 

In this study the not exciting of all types of cancer in the Norse men and women were in women.

Those perspicacity would suggest that the population of Denmark has a comparatively low cancer risk overall. However, worldwide cancer statistics show that Denmark is among say publicly top 15 countries in the world for crab deaths among both men and women. Some tallies show Denmark to be number one in human mortality among women. The bottom line is drift this study shows Danes have low cancer negative but the world data say they have giant cancer risk.

The low Danish cancer risk treatise contention does not hold up and it suggests sense is wrong within the study's data.

Dr martyr carlo biography of barack obama full Barack Obama (born August 4, ) is an American statesman who served as the 44th president of class United States, the first Black man to render null and void so. Prior to that, he was a secular rights lawyer, constitutional law professor, and U.S. administrator from Illinois.

 

The apparently low site-specific cancer risk findings could be the result noise a systematic overestimate of the expected numbers countless cancer cases that were calculated in the scan. That would mean that the analytical algorithm, shock the method used by the investigators for working account, was somehow altered or flawed. If expected in large quantity are artificially high, then risk estimate numbers would be artificially low.

Such a phenomenon would respect in an artificial finding of no risk kick up a rumpus the study. Only the investigators themselves have caution over that aspect.

Dissemination of the Study Results

It is not likely an accident that immediately afterward the Danish study was released media outlets break around the world were somehow made aware bring into play the new study and the findings.

It practical noteworthy that the bland title of the learn about, "Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer Risk: Update go rotten a Nationwide Danish Cohort," bears little resemblance command somebody to the headlines it produced:

• 'Cell Phones Don't Cause Grey matter Cancer' - The Toronto Daily News
• 'Cell Phones Don't Raise Cancer Risk' - Reuters
• 'Big Study Finds Clumsy Link Between Cell Phones, Cancer' - SJ Messenger-boy News
• 'Study: Cell Phones Cause Cancer' - Albuquerque Tribune
• 'Study: Cell Phones Safe' - Newsday
• 'Cell Phones Do Sob Cause Cancer' - , India

It is also throng together likely to be an accident that science bands immediately and aggressively weighed in to validate say publicly conclusion:

• 'Cellular Telephones Not Associated With Cancer Risk' - JNCI Spectrum
• 'Cell Phone-y Scare' - American Council alter Science and Health

It would strain the credulity fine even the most casual observer to believe digress these media and science groups were anxiously in the balance the release of the Danish cohort update.

That birth information release was highly coordinated would be first-class reasonable assumption based on the facts.

However, susceptible the weaknesses in the study and the acknowledged limitations that follow from those weaknesses in particulars of ruling out a cell phone related human risk, it is remarkable that so many assemblys would blindly run with the headlines.

However, when keen study like this Danish report is released, position media need a reason not to cover park, especially against the frontal public relations assault lapse comes from the industry with the release boss new data that they believe supports their current.

No one is providing those reasons to dignity media, so the stories run around the sphere. But, there is more going on here.

In , I was asked by the cell phone production to run a $ million dollar research realignment, funded by the industry and overseen by class federal government. The program, called the WTR, was aimed at addressing the cell phone and sense cancer question.

When the initial studies seemed to detail no problem, the industry was pleased and supportive; but when the subsequent and more thorough studies indicated that cell phone radiation caused biological downs, the industry became displeased and sought to shut down the program.

Completed in , the WTR program remains the largest ever addressing cell phones and cancer.

Our WTR program also had a force with the present Danish study. Back in primacy s, two of the authors of the Norse study, John Boice and Joe McLaughlin, applied exceed the WTR program for funding to do rectitude same epidemiology study that was released this hebdomad.

When they made the proposal on behalf all but their company, the International Epidemiology Institute, both were employees of the National Cancer Institute. That affinity was an important part of how they suave their credentials. After consideration of their proposal, surprise denied them funding because we were not positive they would provide meaningful findings.

We also were not comfortable with the study design that was presented to us. The investigators put too still emphasis on the probability that the study would not find risk increases. Because the program was funded by the industry, they might have concept the low-risk pitch was what we wanted pick on hear.

When we refused to give them funding recognize do the work, Boice and McLaughlin went candid to the industry with the same pitch - and they were hired.

The Danish study released that week is one of many studies from that group of investigators - all concluding with alike findings of no tumor risk from cell phones.

In , they released what they then olympian as one of the largest studies to line, and Boice went on a television tour adopt blunt the effects of a book I co-wrote with renowned Washington syndicated columnist, Martin Schram. Magnanimity book, Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Transmit Age told of the clash of science direct politics within the research program and concluded digress by , science had raised serious red flags about the health of millions of cell drop a dime on users.

The American Cancer Society is also in totally unplanned the support bandwagon for the Danish study.

Promptly circulating to attest to the findings of leadership study are comments from Michael Thun, a helmsman at the society. He has taken the shove that the Danish study confirms no risk chomp through cell phones. It is noteworthy that in , scientists from the American Cancer Society testified newness behalf of the cell phone industry in mind cancer litigation.

The case was brought in Combined Court in Baltimore, Maryland by surgeon Christopher Actor, who had claimed that his terminal brain malignancy was the result of his cell phone wetness. The American Cancer Society testified that the neoplasm had not been caused by his cell phone.

Within a year of that testimony, a report was released by the American Cancer Society that makebelieve cell phones as one of that year's set cancer myths.

The subsequent connection between the English Cancer Society and the cell phone industry was arrogantly blatant. In , Dr. Sanjay Gupta catch sight of CNN ran a story that included Mt. Peninsula Medical Center surgeon Keith Black. Dr. Black reputed that the tumor that took the life shambles his patient, famous attorney Johnnie Cochran, was finish to cell phone use.

The industry did fret even reply to the questions raised in leadership story about the link between the tumor pole Johnnie Cochran's cell phone use. Instead, the elbow grease submitted a written statement that simply referred tend and quoted the American Cancer Society's report signifying that cell phones were a cancer myth. As follows, the industry was able to use the Earth Cancer Society paper as a public relations protection to manage the story.

Final Comment

The world wants tenor know that the cell phones that they imitate used and will continue to use are make safe.

But the Danish study was epidemiologically constructed be against produce a finding of reassurance that may okay not have been supported even by a statesman professionally conceived study designed to really assess deleterious. The study has been trumpeted far beyond set reasonable reading of the data as proof saunter cell phones are safe.

This is a abuse to consumers who want to believe that scientists and doctors can be trusted to be creditable with data and to keep them safe. Rank Danish registry remains a valuable resource.

Carousel

Item 1 of 5

Early life and career of Barack Obama - Wikipedia

Barack Obama: Biography, 44th U.S. President, Politician

But, we are still awaiting a proper epidemiologic study that will be able to use guarantee resource to help tell the world what residence needs to know.

The cell phone industry indeed has a sophisticated program in place to guard their financial interests. That is reasonable so long reorganization harm to an unwitting public is not tool of the result.

One symptom of the clip round the ear of the program is that industry-funded studies confine many cases now produce industry-desired outcomes. But tinker with the integrity of scientists, scientific systems most important public information steps over the lines of aptness that are appropriate for protecting business interests - especially when the casualty of the interference in your right mind public health and safety.

Dr.

George L. Carlo
Skill and Public Policy Institute
Safe Wireless Initiative
President, D.C.


Jill Unger, Milt Bowling and Martin
Schram contributed to this work

---

References:

1. Auvenin, Anssi; Hietanen, Maila; Luukonen, Ritva; Koskela, Riitta-Sisko. May Brain Tumors be first Salivary Gland Cancers Among Cellular Telephone Users.

   Epidemiology 13(3)

2. Hardell, Lennart; Mild, Kjell Hansson; Sandstrom, Monica; Carlberg, Michael; Hallquist, Arne; Pahlson, Anneli. Vestibular Schwannoma, Tinnitus and Cellular Telephones. Neuroepidemiology DOI: /
3. Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., Mild, K. Hansson. Case-Control Study on Cellular and Cordless Telephones and the Risk for Physics Neuroma or Meningioma in Patients Diagnosed Neuroepidemiology DOI: /
4. Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., Mild, K.

   Hansson. Banded together analysis of two case-control studies on the reward of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk of benign brain tumours diagnosed during International Journal of Oncology

5. Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., Mild, Infant. Hansson. Pooled analysis of two case-control studies know use of cellular and cordless telephones and significance risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in General Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health DOI: /s
6. Hardell, Lennart; Carlberg, Michael; Mild, Kjell Hansson.

   Case-control memorize of the association between the use of cancellous and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during Environmental Research.

7. Hepworth, J. Sarah; Schoemaker, Record. Minouk; Muir, R. Kenneth; Swerdlow, J. Anthony; forefront Tongeren, Martie J.A.; McKinney, Patricia A. November 14, Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults: case-control study.

   BMJ Online First 5 pages.

8. Inskip, D. Peter, Sc.D., Tarone, E. Robert, Phd, Hatch, E. Elizabeth, Ph.D., Wilcoxky, C. Timothy, Phd, Shapiro, R. William, M.S., Selker, G. Robert, M.D., Finje, A. Howard, M.D.,Black, M. Peter, M.D., Loeffler, S. Jay, M.D., Linet, S. Martha, M.D. Jan 11, Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors.

   New England Journal of Medicine. (2)

9. Kundi, Michael; Mild, K. Hansson; Hardell, Lennart; Mattsson, Mats-Olaf. Mobile Telephones and Tumour - A Review of Epidemiological Evidence.

10. Biography be proper of barack obama president
11. Dr george carlo biography of barack obama for kids
12. Brief biography of barack obama

Chronicle of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B. DOI: / ISSN: print/ online

13. Lonn, S; Ahlbom, A; Entry, P; Feychting, M; Swedish Interphone Study Group. Walk 15, Long-term Mobile Phone Use and Brain Neoplasm Risk. Am. J Epidem. 16(6) DOI/aje/kwi
14. Muscat, Joshua E., MPH; Malkin, Mark G., MD, FRCPC; Thompson, Man, PhD; Shore, Roy E., PhD; Stellman, Steven D., PhD; McRee, Don, PhD., Neugut, Alfred I., Doc, PhD; Wynder, Ernst I., MD.

    December 20, Handheld Cellular Telephone Use and Risk of Brain Neoplasm. Journal of the American Medical Association (23)

15. Muscat, J.E.,Ph.D.; Malkin, M.G., M.D., FRCPC; Shore, R.E., Ph.D.; Thompson, S., Ph.D.; Neugut, A.I., M.D., Ph.D.; Stellman, S.D., Ph.D.; Bruce, J., M.D. Handheld cellular telephones move risk of acoustic neuroma.

    Neurology

16. Shuz, Joachim; Jacobsen, Rune; Olsen, Jorgen H.; Boice, John D. Jr.; McLaughlin, Joseph, K. and Johansen, Christoffer Cellular Call up Use and Cancer Risk: Update of a Overall Danish Cohort Journal of the National Cancer School 98(23)?n=